From the Herald Tribune on Shonda Johnson-

Court: Walker County woman again facing death sentence

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A Walker County woman is again looking at the death penalty for having one of her husbands killed because he got her prosecuted for bigamy.

On Friday, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed a ruling by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, which had overturned the capital murder conviction and death sentence of Shonda Nicole Johnson.

Johnson was convicted in 1999 of the shooting death of Randy McCullar in a church parking lot in rural Walker County on Nov. 30, 1997. The capital murder charge involved killing a person who had been a grand jury witness.

Testimony at the trial showed that Johnson was still married to McCullar when she married William Howard McIntyre Jr. in 1995 and when she married Tim Richards in 1997.

McCullar testified before a grand jury and got Johnson prosecuted for bigamy. He also filed for divorce and custody of their child three weeks before he was killed.

According to testimony, Johnson was so mad that she tried to get a former boyfriend she lived with between the McIntyre and Richards weddings to kill McCullar, but he wouldn't. Then she persuaded Richards to cut McCullar's tire while he was in a lounge. According to testimony, Richards and Johnson followed McCullar to a church parking lot, where Johnson gave Richards a loaded gun and got him to kill McCullar.

The appeals court overturned Johnson's conviction and death sentence in 2005 because it said the judge should have told jurors to limit how they considered the evidence about the bigamy charge and prior "adulterous acts."

The Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision written by Republican Justice Mike Bolin, said there was no need for limiting instructions because the evidence "was properly admitted as substantive evidence of the offense with which Johnson was charged."

Johnson's case now goes back to a lower court for the reinstatement of her death sentence.


  1. I am referencing the Tim Richards and Shonda Johnson case. What testimony are you referring to?

  2. You are confused. I didnt write this article it is from the AP newswire.

  3. I've been researching the case for almost 12 years now and it is a mystery, but its kind of a mystery like a classic who done it, you know? I still don't believe that the real killer has been caught yet. I feel that there could be more people involved or know more about it, than what thy are willing to say.


What Are Your Thoughts? Remember, you don't have to read this blog if it makes you mad. Name-calling and temper tantrums have no place here.

How to be a Guest on True Crime TV