Jamie Silvonek Pennsylvania


  1. I don't know enough about this case, but it's seems pretty obvious the 20 year old is a sociopath. They have video of this guy going into his initial trial and he's smiling. No scruples!

    This should be a pretty interesting case. The texts between the 14 year old and the 20 year old appear pretty damning. I am ambivalent about the girl being placed in an adult facility until the courts decide if she is a co-conspirator.

    In any event, it's tragic. She seems pretty intelligent. Her Twitter bio says "Incurable optimist with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a ravenous appetite for adventure." What 14 year old talks like that?

    She definitely had a role to play, but I hope the courts don't base the "truth" on informal means of communication.

    1. Im with you there. Shes obviously smarter than your average 14 year old but that could work for or against her! Im also curious as to how this turns out.

  2. Here's what happened: She was to be tried as an adult; she was determined to have been the genesis of the killing; she admitted guilt today; and she issued a quote: "I AM A MONSTER". I think that sums it up.


What Are Your Thoughts? Remember, you don't have to read this blog if it makes you mad. Name-calling and temper tantrums have no place here.

How to be a Guest on True Crime TV